XML in publishing
              For Young, the reason to use XML is simple--it allows
              Hachette to develop and deliver content to readers in
              the formats they want. It also saves money on
              production costs and can lead to new revenue streams.
              Young noted there are some estimates that put the
              number of handheld devices in the world at 3 billion,
              which, he said, equates to “3 billion blank pages.”
              To reach that audience, content needs to be flexible
              enough to be delivered in a variety of ways, Young
              said. Since XML uses a content-centric,
              design-agnostic approach to production, an XML file
              is uniquely suited to deliver content as an e-book or
              through print-on-demand, he said.
              
              
              The effective use of XML, however, requires
              cooperation and commitment throughout the production
              process, beginning with editors and authors, Young
              said. By using XML to tag content, editors are in a
              position to help shape how that content will be
              delivered, Young said, predicting that “tagging will
              become as ingrained as the blue pencil.” Young
              acknowledged that editors will need to be trained on
              how to tag and that they will need to develop new
              skills and have new tools. “It will be a sea change”
              about who does what, Young said, but ultimately the
              changes will open up new revenue opportunities.
              
              
              Speakers on the rest of the morning’s panels expanded
              on various themes introduced by Young. Brian O’ Leary
              of Magellan Media Consulting Partners, said that
              publishers will only be able to fully capitalize n
              XML if they adopt a discipline approach to using it,
              which begins with editors tagging the information. He
              noted that some types of books will work benefit more
              from XML than others (a point made by one of the
              conference organizers, Mike Shatzkin in his What the
              Hell is XML piece which appeared in the Dec. 15 PW).
              Rebecca Goldthwaite of Cengage Learning noted that
              among the lessons learned in implementing XML there
              was the need for a “culture change,” and for XML to
              be used consistently throughout. Simon &
              Schuster’s Steve Kotrch emphasized the ability using
              XML gives a publisher to create more robust rights
              databases that can be hooked to other databases to
              exchange information.
              
              
              Evan Schnittman of Oxford University Press touched on
              the benefits of using XML in terms of improving
              search results on Google. The ability to put books
              (and other content) into “chunks” enhances the
              chances that those books will be discovered through
              traditional Google searches rather than only through
              Google Book Search, Schnittman said. He noted that
              OUP has created a “significant revenue stream” as a
              result of its books being discovered through Google.
              OUP has 15,564 titles in Google Book Search, which
              have generated more than 143 million page views,
              Schnittman said which in turn has led to more than
              734,000 clicks on a buy link or 47.2 buy clicks per
              book. Bill O’Brien of the Copyright Clearance Center
              also brought up chunking, noting that chunking leads
              to “micro commerce,” which can accumulate late into a
              significant sum. (CCC has dispersed $1 billion to
              publishers since it was launched 30 years ago, he
              said).
Multipurposing material is where they are looking to make their money next.